It sounds to me that Ice Scream 1 and Ice Scream 2 point to the product identifiers of Ice Scream 3. That's just a quick opinion. Since you do not give the exact guideline names for them being rejected, It's only a guessing game.

when compatibility is set to iOS 6 and higher iOS 6 is more than 10 years old and iPhone 6s's initial OS version is iOS 9. How would you do that?

Waiting for a software title to be reviewed for 12 days has nothing to do with how you handled Resolution Center cases in the past unless you intentionally submit an update without addressing issues or intentionally revert past resolutions they have accepted.

We have NO exchange features. It does as any other wallet does - sends coins to other wallets. There is no middleman or monetary exchange. Don't file an appeal. Just tell it. Reviewers aren't always right. In fact, they are often wrong. Roughly, two out of three times, they are wrong. Last time, I had a desktop application rejected after they ignored all instructions provided under the App Review Information section. They were given multiple alert messages. But they still managed to play dumb. Its iOS counterpart part was also rejected for the same reason two weeks before. I don't know how things work with the crypt things.

apple reviewer's are using IPad to check my Iphone only apps What would you find if you search for 'review with iPad iPhone-only app' or equivalent? They've been doing it for more than 10 years even for iPhone-only apps. I don't see an issue. What's the injury if they use an iPad to test your iPhone-only app? You are making a lot of English grammatical mistakes. In English, every sentence starts with a capital letter.

There was a similar question about a week ago concerning a dating app for tall people in France being rejected. Asking the same question is one. Receiving a personal reply for the same question is another.

It's true. There are no search hits for 'zenterm.'

I had an army of subscription plans approved with a new software update days after the initial submission went through 3 or 4 months ago. So you must have done something wrong that you are not telling us.

theres a text that says 'By using Facial Scanning you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms" and the same for Ai Morph except it says Ai Morph Feature and not face scan. It appears that they have told you clearly what you should do to move forward. So what's the holdback?

So the only way I can actually submit the subs is on their own, straight from the Subscriptions page. You do what!? the option to submit my subscriptions alongside it just isn't there. What would you need it for? If I were you, I would have my app go through the review process without IAP at first. And I then submit a new software update with subscription plans.

Is an Organization Apple Developer account strictly required for this type of restaurant delivery driver app? Have you studied the distinction between the individual and the organization memberships? Who is the seller of the app? If the seller is your company, then, I suppose, your company has to be enrolled.

If anyone has successfully published a similar app, I’d really appreciate hearing what changes or clarifications helped during review. Have you searched for 'apple app store sweepstakes'? I find one or more sweepstakes apps.

It sounds to me that the product points to a wrong product identifier.

Have you looked under Business > Agreements to see all items have been accepted?

I provided a demo link in the place asked and re-submitted but I keep on getting the same (automated?) response. What's stopping you from give them an actual screen-capture video under the App Review Information section?