Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to Why pip install tensorflow-macos==2.15.0 downgrade Keras to 2.15.0
Same problem. I am trying the following: this link https://keras.io/getting_started/ suggests the compatbilities. TensorFlow compatibility The following Keras + TensorFlow versions are compatible with each other: To use Keras 3: tensorflow==2.15.0 & keras==3.0.0 tensorflow==2.16.0 & keras==3.0.0 Considering there is not tf-macos 2.16, I am using the first option with pip install. There is this post I tried last week and it was working. I had to delete the venv, which was experimental, and now I can't replicate the result. I tried it because I also have the convergence problem, but I was able to solve it with Keras 3.0.0. When I try to install Keras 3.0.0, I receive the following error: "ERROR: pip's dependency resolver does not currently take into account all the packages that are installed. This behaviour is the source of the following dependency conflicts. tensorflow-macos 2.15.0 requires keras<2.16,>=2.15.0, but you have keras 3.0.0 which is incompatible." I also tried to install Keras-nightly and at least it works. This are the result of a base ResNet50 with imagenet weights from tf. Epoch 1/5 2/2 [==============================] - 14s 4s/step - loss: 6.4140 - accuracy: 0.3750 - val_loss: 9.1743 - val_accuracy: 0.5000 Epoch 2/5 2/2 [==============================] - 2s 355ms/step - loss: 1.2155 - accuracy: 0.7750 - val_loss: 9.4366 - val_accuracy: 0.7000 Epoch 3/5 2/2 [==============================] - 1s 601ms/step - loss: 4.1899 - accuracy: 0.6750 - val_loss: 539.9166 - val_accuracy: 0.6000 Epoch 4/5 2/2 [==============================] - 1s 571ms/step - loss: 0.3937 - accuracy: 0.8500 - val_loss: 1690.7887 - val_accuracy: 0.5000 Epoch 5/5 2/2 [==============================] - 1s 593ms/step - loss: 0.7857 - accuracy: 0.9750 - val_loss: 5639.2158 - val_accuracy: 0.5000 training time acceptable, training accuracy and loss okay. Still, there are problems with validation loss and accuracy, but it is a small step forward. The pity is that I was able to make it work, but I had problems with Quarto for other reasons.
Feb ’24
Reply to Why pip install tensorflow-macos==2.15.0 downgrade Keras to 2.15.0
Same problem. I am trying the following: this link https://keras.io/getting_started/ suggests the compatbilities. TensorFlow compatibility The following Keras + TensorFlow versions are compatible with each other: To use Keras 3: tensorflow==2.15.0 & keras==3.0.0 tensorflow==2.16.0 & keras==3.0.0 Considering there is not tf-macos 2.16, I am using the first option with pip install. There is this post I tried last week and it was working. I had to delete the venv, which was experimental, and now I can't replicate the result. I tried it because I also have the convergence problem, but I was able to solve it with Keras 3.0.0. When I try to install Keras 3.0.0, I receive the following error: "ERROR: pip's dependency resolver does not currently take into account all the packages that are installed. This behaviour is the source of the following dependency conflicts. tensorflow-macos 2.15.0 requires keras<2.16,>=2.15.0, but you have keras 3.0.0 which is incompatible." I also tried to install Keras-nightly and at least it works. This are the result of a base ResNet50 with imagenet weights from tf. Epoch 1/5 2/2 [==============================] - 14s 4s/step - loss: 6.4140 - accuracy: 0.3750 - val_loss: 9.1743 - val_accuracy: 0.5000 Epoch 2/5 2/2 [==============================] - 2s 355ms/step - loss: 1.2155 - accuracy: 0.7750 - val_loss: 9.4366 - val_accuracy: 0.7000 Epoch 3/5 2/2 [==============================] - 1s 601ms/step - loss: 4.1899 - accuracy: 0.6750 - val_loss: 539.9166 - val_accuracy: 0.6000 Epoch 4/5 2/2 [==============================] - 1s 571ms/step - loss: 0.3937 - accuracy: 0.8500 - val_loss: 1690.7887 - val_accuracy: 0.5000 Epoch 5/5 2/2 [==============================] - 1s 593ms/step - loss: 0.7857 - accuracy: 0.9750 - val_loss: 5639.2158 - val_accuracy: 0.5000 training time acceptable, training accuracy and loss okay. Still, there are problems with validation loss and accuracy, but it is a small step forward. The pity is that I was able to make it work, but I had problems with Quarto for other reasons.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Feb ’24