Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Comment on A case against TN3135 WatchOS restrictions (NWPathMonitor)
Still thinking...and now feel a bit put off by your comment. "it isn't the silver bullet..." - but why? I've proven otherwise with about 15 lines of code. Please tell me why it doesn't work after I've proven to myself that it does exactly what my use case requires.. If the issue is battery life with polling involved, you've just shifted the polling requirement to us. I doubt we can be nearly as efficient as the framework. Sorry to be harsh, I appreciate your time and feedback.
Jun ’24
Comment on WatchOS App Review Rejected for UIRequiredDeviceCapabilities
@Frameworks Engineer Thanks for the comment. I do not agree with your premise "it's impossible to interpret the response". I submitted a WatchOS autonomous app - it is clear they are unable to install that app on an iPhone. Second, Apple provides absolutely no resource that answers the question: "What UIRequiredDeviceCapabilities are required/available for WatchOS?" Here is the key question: "What do I need to register as UIReqiuredDeviceCapabilities specifically for an autonomous WatchOS app?"
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Jul ’23
Comment on Rejection because subscriptions unavailable at time of review
I have modified the app. It will now present an opening view and then an error view if there are no subscriptions available. This is in order to assist with the App Review. I don't think the change will affect the UX in the long run. Hopefully that will allow the team to get through their process successfully. Thanks for your response.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Aug ’24
Comment on A case against TN3135 WatchOS restrictions (NWPathMonitor)
Hey Quinn, And now I know! :-) I'm going to accept Kevin's answer since .taskIsWaitingForConnectivity provided a solution that is acceptable (albeit with much more code). I hope that Apple reviews this informational only API and releases the chains for truly independent watchOS apps. I appreciate you spending your valuable time to respond. Respectfully Randy
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’24
Comment on A case against TN3135 WatchOS restrictions (NWPathMonitor)
Still thinking...and now feel a bit put off by your comment. "it isn't the silver bullet..." - but why? I've proven otherwise with about 15 lines of code. Please tell me why it doesn't work after I've proven to myself that it does exactly what my use case requires.. If the issue is battery life with polling involved, you've just shifted the polling requirement to us. I doubt we can be nearly as efficient as the framework. Sorry to be harsh, I appreciate your time and feedback.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’24
Comment on WatchOS App Review Rejected for UIRequiredDeviceCapabilities
@Frameworks Engineer Thanks for the comment. I do not agree with your premise "it's impossible to interpret the response". I submitted a WatchOS autonomous app - it is clear they are unable to install that app on an iPhone. Second, Apple provides absolutely no resource that answers the question: "What UIRequiredDeviceCapabilities are required/available for WatchOS?" Here is the key question: "What do I need to register as UIReqiuredDeviceCapabilities specifically for an autonomous WatchOS app?"
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jul ’23