@Etresoft - I left a descriptive note and a reply to the rejection; hoping an actual human reads it. I guess I'm thinking if that's the mechanism most easily afforded us (developers, submitters), then they should be pretty proactive about looking at those responses. ** shrug ** Here's hoping. Thanks for the info. My company is already talking about scrapping the app(s) (or at least back-burner-ing them) and just going with a site for everything to alleviate this crap in the future. Ultimately, it's my call to make (I'm the head of tech, but still report to people who are very much hands on). The idea of just another website, emitting just another attack vector, with just another bundle of common-denominator crap functionality, and a "looks like every other site" visual presence makes me queasy. The idea of websites being the primary use surface in 2026 just feels... I dunno... give-ey-up-ey. I dunno.

Well, it's not spam, it's not any of that, it's a legit health-care/health-data system, so it's queued incorrectly. :( I guess I'll wait.